Why Go-to-Market Strategy Is So Challenging for Founders
- Dan Schoenbaum
- Oct 27
- 6 min read
As a cybersecurity founder, you've built innovative technology that solves real security problems. Your product can detect threats faster, protect critical infrastructure, or prevent breaches that keep CISOs up at night. Yet despite having a superior solution, you're struggling to gain market traction. You're not alone—go-to-market (GTM) strategy remains one of the biggest challenges facing cybersecurity startups today.
After working with dozens of cybersecurity companies from seed stage to successful exits, we've identified the core reasons why GTM is uniquely difficult in this space. Understanding these challenges is the first step toward overcoming them.
The Technical Founder's Dilemma
Most cybersecurity founders come from deeply technical backgrounds—former threat researchers, security engineers, or intelligence professionals who saw a gap in the market and built technology to fill it. This technical expertise is your superpower when building the product, but it often becomes a liability when selling it.
The challenge? You're speaking a different language than your buyers. When you explain your solution, you naturally gravitate toward technical details: the architecture, the algorithms, the detection techniques. But your buyers—even technical CISOs—need to understand business outcomes first. They want to know how you'll reduce their risk, simplify their operations, or help them meet compliance requirements.
This disconnect creates a common trap: founders spend months refining their technology while their sales pipeline remains empty, wondering why such an obviously superior product isn't selling itself. Many of these challenges stem from common GTM mistakes that can be avoided with the right guidance.
A Crowded and Complex Market Landscape
The cybersecurity market is notoriously fragmented. Gartner tracks over 20 distinct security categories, and new subcategories emerge every year. Is your solution a SIEM? XDR? Attack surface management? Cloud security posture management? Where do you fit in the security stack?
This categorization problem creates several GTM challenges:
Positioning confusion: If prospects can't quickly understand what category you're in and why you're different, you'll lose deals before you even get a meeting. In a crowded market where buyers evaluate 5-10 vendors per purchase, unclear positioning is fatal. Sometimes, creating a new category is the answer—but it requires courage and strategic thinking.
Analyst relations complexity: Industry analysts like Gartner and Forrester heavily influence enterprise security purchases. But getting recognized by analysts requires sustained engagement, and being placed in the wrong category can hurt more than help.
Competitive differentiation: With thousands of security vendors, how do you stand out? Many founders fall into the trap of competing on features, leading to a "speeds and feeds" battle that commoditizes the market and squeezes margins.
Long, Complex Sales Cycles
Enterprise cybersecurity sales are rarely simple or quick. The average sales cycle for security solutions ranges from 6 to 18 months, and involves multiple stakeholders:
The security team evaluating technical capabilities
IT operations concerned about deployment complexity
Procurement pushing back on pricing
Legal reviewing data handling and compliance
The CFO questioning budget allocation
Executive leadership demanding ROI justification
Each stakeholder has different priorities and objections. Your technical champion might love your product, but if you can't address the CFO's concerns about budget or the CISO's fear of adding another tool to an already bloated security stack, the deal stalls.
Many cybersecurity founders underestimate the sales resources required to navigate this complexity. They hire a couple of sales reps, provide minimal enablement, and wonder why deals aren't closing. Enterprise security sales requires a sophisticated, consultative approach that most first-time founders haven't built before.
The Trust and Credibility Gap
Cybersecurity purchases involve enormous trust. Organizations are essentially giving you access to their most sensitive security data and trusting you to protect their crown jewels. For an unknown startup, overcoming this trust barrier is immense.
Enterprises want to see:
Recognizable customer logos (but how do you get your first enterprise customer?)
Third-party certifications and compliance attestations
Validation from industry analysts
Proof of financial stability (will you be around in three years?)
Evidence that you understand their specific threat landscape
Building this credibility takes time and resources that early-stage startups often lack. Meanwhile, established vendors with strong brand recognition have a significant advantage, even if their technology is inferior.
Pricing and Packaging Complexity
How do you price a cybersecurity solution? Per user? Per asset? Per GB of data? Flat fee? Consumption-based? The wrong pricing model can kill your growth.
We've seen founders make critical mistakes:
Underpricing to win early customers, then struggling to raise prices later without alienating your base. Cybersecurity buyers often equate low prices with inferior solutions, so discounting can actually hurt credibility.
Overcomplicating pricing with too many tiers, add-ons, and variables that confuse buyers and slow down deals. When a prospect can't easily understand what they'll pay, they'll often choose the vendor with simpler pricing.
Misaligning pricing with value: If your pricing model doesn't reflect the value you deliver, you'll either leave money on the table or price yourself out of the market.
Getting pricing right requires deep understanding of your buyer's budget cycles, competitive alternatives, and willingness to pay—knowledge that technical founders rarely have without external guidance.
The Product-Market Fit Paradox
Here's a paradox we see constantly: cybersecurity founders build solutions for problems they encountered in their previous roles, assuming the market has the same problem. Sometimes they're right. Often, they're not.
What feels like an urgent problem to you might be a low-priority issue for your target market. Or worse, you might be solving yesterday's problem while the threat landscape has evolved. By the time you've built a solution and taken it to market, buyer priorities may have shifted.
This creates a painful situation where you have a technically excellent product that solves a real problem—just not one that enough people are actively trying to solve right now. Pivoting at this stage is expensive and demoralizing, but pressing forward with the wrong product-market fit is worse. If you're unsure whether you've achieved product-market fit, assess these critical indicators before scaling your sales team.
Resource Constraints and Founder Bandwidth
Go-to-market execution requires sustained investment in areas outside most founders' comfort zones: content marketing, sales enablement, analyst relations, partner ecosystem development, customer success, and more.
Most cybersecurity startups are capital-efficient by necessity. You're trying to stretch limited runway across engineering, sales, and marketing while also managing investors, recruiting talent, and putting out daily fires. GTM strategy often gets fragmented attention—a few hours here and there between product releases and board meetings.
But effective GTM requires consistent, focused execution. You can't build a repeatable sales motion with sporadic effort. The result? Founders end up doing too many things poorly rather than a few things exceptionally well. This is where fractional GTM leadership can bridge the gap without the cost of a full-time executive.
The Solution: Strategic GTM Expertise
Understanding why GTM is hard is important. But knowing what to do about it is what separates companies that scale from those that stagnate.
Successful cybersecurity companies approach GTM strategically:
They nail their positioning early, clearly articulating who they serve, what problem they solve, and why they're the best choice. They don't try to be all things to all people.
They build repeatable sales processes that acknowledge the complexity of enterprise security buying while creating predictable pipeline progression. They invest in proper sales enablement and choose metrics that matter.
They align marketing and sales around a common understanding of the ideal customer profile and buying journey. They create content that addresses real buyer concerns at each stage of the decision process.
They leverage partnerships strategically, whether that's technology integrations, channel partnerships, or relationships with systems integrators who already have customer trust.
They seek external expertise when needed. The most successful founders recognize what they don't know and bring in experienced GTM advisors who've navigated these challenges before and delivered proven results.
Moving Forward
If you're a cybersecurity founder struggling with go-to-market execution, you're facing legitimate challenges that even well-funded companies with experienced teams find difficult. The key is recognizing these obstacles early and addressing them systematically rather than hoping better technology alone will win the market.
The good news? These challenges are solvable. With the right strategy, positioning, and execution support, cybersecurity startups can break through the noise and build predictable, scalable revenue growth.
The question isn't whether GTM is hard—it is. The question is whether you'll tackle it strategically or learn these lessons the expensive way.
About High Tide Advisors
High Tide Advisors specializes in go-to-market strategy and fractional leadership for cybersecurity companies. We have made significant impact to founders' success and scale with four exits in the last three years alone.
Our team has helped dozens of security startups navigate the challenges outlined above, from clarifying positioning and messaging to building repeatable sales processes and managing successful exits. If you're facing GTM challenges in your cybersecurity company, let's talk about how we can help.
Related Reading:
